Taxanes in the Adjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer: Why Not Yet?
Open Access
- 1 December 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI Monographs
- Vol. 2001 (30) , 88-95
- https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a003468
Abstract
The taxanes paclitaxel and docetaxel represent the most active chemotherapeutic agents developed for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in the last decade, and they are now being incorporated into adjuvant chemotherapy trials for lymph node-positive breast cancer with the hope of improving on the results achieved with CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil) or anthracycline-based regimens. So far, three randomized paclitaxel-based adjuvant clinical trials enrolling 3170 women (Cancer and Leukemia Group B [CALGB] 9344), 3060 women (National Surgical Adjuvant Project for Breast and Bowel Cancers [NSABP]-B28), and 524 women (M. D. Anderson), respectively, have been reported with respective median follow-up times of 52, 34, and 43 months. This article critically reviews these three studies and gives an overview of the many other randomized clinical trials, due to accrue more than 17 000 women, which are investigating the potential of taxanes in adjuvant breast cancer therapy. Given that the early promise of taxanes suggested by CALGB 9344 is not yet confirmed by the two other trials, only level 2 evidence has been reached to date in regard to a positive contribution of these agents to breast cancer outcome in the adjuvant setting. It is argued that level 1 evidence is highly desirable before adopting taxane-based regimens in standard practice. It is anticipated that a meta-analysis will be needed to comprehensively define the value of taxanes in early breast cancer, and a new model of international collaboration is proposed to find a balance between the need to offer new, more effective therapies to patients as soon as possible and the danger of drawing wrong, premature conclusions regarding the magnitude of benefit of a new regimen.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Randomized Intergroup Trial of Cisplatin-Paclitaxel Versus Cisplatin-Cyclophosphamide in Women With Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Three-Year ResultsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2000
- DocetaxelDrugs, 2000
- Polychemotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trialsThe Lancet, 1998
- PaclitaxelDrugs & Aging, 1998
- Cyclophosphamide and Cisplatin Compared with Paclitaxel and Cisplatin in Patients with Stage III and Stage IV Ovarian CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Loss of normal p53 function confers sensitization to Taxol by increasing G2/M arrest and apoptosisNature Medicine, 1996
- Fluorouracil plus Levamisole as Effective Adjuvant Therapy after Resection of Stage III Colon Carcinoma: A Final ReportAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1995
- Sequential methods based on the boundaries approach for the clinical comparison of survival timesStatistics in Medicine, 1994
- Dose and Dose Intensity of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage II, Node-Positive Breast CarcinomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Group sequential methods in the design and analysis of clinical trialsBiometrika, 1977