“Mistakes were made”: Organizations, apologia, and crises of social legitimacy
- 1 March 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communication Studies
- Vol. 46 (1-2) , 1-17
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979509368435
Abstract
Organizations charged with wrongdoing often face social legitimacy crises and subsequently issue apologiae. Whether the charge is rooted in incompetence, as was Exxon's after the Alaskan oil spill, or a policy choice viewed to be irresponsible, as in the case of Domino's Pizza after a series of fatal automobile accidents, corporate apologists seek to purify their damaged images through a negative strategy of dissociation and a positive strategy of corrective action and reaffirmation of public values. This generic analysis suggests that corporate apologia warrants a distinct line of research due to the significant'differences that distinguish itffbm individualist conceptions of apologia.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Exxon Valdez: How to spend billions and still get a black eyePublic Relations Review, 1991
- The new managerial rhetoric and the old criticismQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1988
- Transforming scandal into tragedy: A rhetoric of political apologyQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1985
- Kategoriaandapologia:On their rhetorical criticism as a speech setQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1982
- Apologia in team sportQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1981
- Failure of apology in American politics: Nixon on WatergateSpeech Monographs, 1975
- Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational BehaviorThe Pacific Sociological Review, 1975
- They spoke in defense of themselves: On the generic criticism of apologiaQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1973
- The Historical Enigma of Corporate LegitimacyCalifornia Law Review, 1972
- A pentadic analysis of senator Edward Kennedy's address to the people of massachusetts, July 25, 1969Central States Speech Journal, 1970