Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression?
- 23 October 2008
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in BJU International
- Vol. 102 (10) , 1413-1418
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2008.07791.x
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To prospectively examine the effects of the margin status after radical prostatectomy (RP), the location, and the number of positive surgical margins (PSMs) on biochemical and clinical outcome, as even if there seems to be little debate that there is a higher risk of both local and distant recurrence of prostate cancer in the face of a PSM the significance of a PSM after RP is only followed for biochemical progression in most studies.PATIENTS AND METHODS: From our prospective database, 406 consecutive well‐described patients without neoadjuvant and ‘direct postoperative’ adjuvant therapy who underwent RP were included. The median age was 64.7 years, the median preoperative PSA level was 7.9 ng/mL, and the median follow‐up was 5.2 years. We analysed pathological tumour stage, grading, number and location of PSMs, PSA‐free survival, local recurrence‐free survival, metastasis‐free survival, prostate cancer‐specific and, overall survival prospectively.RESULTS: The overall rate of PSMs was 17.2%. The number was higher in higher stage (P < 0.001) and higher grade tumours (P = 0.041). For a PSM the PSA recurrence rate was 64.3%, the local recurrence rate was 18.6%, the development of distant metastasis was 15.7% and therefore much higher than in patients with negative margins (20.5%, 2.7%, and 1.5%). A PSM was an adverse predictor for PSA‐free survival (P < 0.001), local recurrence‐free survival (P = 0.002), and development of metastasis (P = 0.003) on multivariate analysis. The number and location of PSMs was of no additional prognostic value.CONCLUSIONS: A PSM increases the risk of biochemical and clinical e.g. local, disease progression after RP. The number and location of PSMs is of minor importance. Although only ≈20% of patients with a PSM will develop local recurrence, surgeons should continue to strive to reduce the rate of PSMs to improve cancer control.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predicting the Outcome of Salvage Radiation Therapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical ProstatectomyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- The Actual Value of the Surgical Margin Status as a Predictor of Disease Progression in Men with Early Prostate CancerEuropean Urology, 2006
- The Positive Surgical Margin after Radical Prostatectomy—Why do we Still not Really Know What it Means?European Urology, 2006
- BIOCHEMICAL FAILURE IN MEN FOLLOWING RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY: IMPACT OF SURGICAL MARGIN STATUS AND LOCATIONJournal of Urology, 2004
- Avoidance and management of positive surgical margins before, during and after radical prostatectomyProstate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2002
- USE OF GLEASON SCORE, PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN, SEMINAL VESICLE AND MARGIN STATUS TO PREDICT BIOCHEMICAL FAILURE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMYJournal of Urology, 2001
- Immediate Hormonal Therapy Compared with Observation after Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Men with Node-Positive Prostate CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Prognostic Significance of Positive Surgical Margins in Radical Prostatectomy SpecimensJournal of Urology, 1995
- Randomized Prospective Study Comparing Radical Prostatectomy Alone Versus Radical Prostatectomy Preceded by Androgen Blockage in Clinical Stage B2 (T2bNxM0) Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, 1995
- The Prostatic CapsuleThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1989