Abstract
Most researchers agree that presidential debates inform voters, but they disagree about whether debates only serve to widen a knowledge gap. The alternative perspective is that the holding of televised debates serves to inform a wider spectrum of voters than not holding them would. Re‐analysis of pre‐debate and post‐debate surveys from the fall 1988 campaign shows: 1) knowledge gap indices gained predictive power once debates began, but 2) even after controlling for knowledge gap indices, presidential debate exposure still predicted knowledge gains.

This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit: