Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: 25 vs. 50 μg dose regimen
- 2 January 2001
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
- Vol. 72 (1) , 25-30
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7292(00)00308-8
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor inductionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1999
- A double-blind randomized trial of two dose regimens of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor inductionThe Journal of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, 1999
- Randomized trial of two doses of the prostaglandin E1 analog misoprostol for labor inductionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1997
- A randomized comparison between misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction in patients with unfavorable cervicesObstetrics & Gynecology, 1997
- Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: A meta-analysisObstetrics & Gynecology, 1997
- Oral or vaginal misoprostol for induction of laborInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1997
- A comparison of differing dosing regimens of vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening and labor inductionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
- Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel (Prepidil gel): Randomized comparisonAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- A comparison of misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening and labor inductionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
- Misoprostol: An effective agent for cervical ripening and labor inductionAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995