Impact of probe penetration on the electrical characterization of sub-50 nm profiles
- 1 January 2002
- journal article
- Published by American Vacuum Society in Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures
- Vol. 20 (1) , 459-466
- https://doi.org/10.1116/1.1432965
Abstract
The spreading resistance probe (SRP) and four point probe (FPP) use, respectively, two or four metal probes with loads in the range of 5–100 g to obtain indispensable information on the electrical characteristics (sheet resistance, junction depth, activation degree, profile shape) of impurity depth profiles in silicon. Recently, however, it has been reported that FPP sheet values are becoming irreproducible and that SRP depth profiles can be significantly shallower than the corresponding secondary ion mass spectrometry dopant profiles for ultrashallow structures. In this work we analyze the impact of probe penetration on the accuracy of SRP and FPP measurements for a series of sub-50 nm profiles with different steepness and substrate level. The probe penetration has been measured by atomic force microscopy and ranged from 5 to 130 nm. The FPP sheet resistance errors of up to 300%, as found for the higher loads, can be correlated with the penetration of the probes through the electrical junction taking into account material removal effects. Experimental data and simulations indicate that SRP raw data are relatively insensitive to probe penetration for source/drain implantation and diffusion profiles. Dependent on the structure involved, however, the SRP depth scale must be corrected for an offset due to probe penetration.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Activation and deactivation studies of laser thermal annealed boron, arsenic, phosphorus, and antimony ultra-shallow abrupt junctionsPublished by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,2003
- Need to incorporate the real micro-contact distribution in spreading resistance correction schemesJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures, 2000
- Qualification of spreading resistance probe operations. IIJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures, 2000
- Design and integration considerations for end-of-the roadmap ultrashallow junctionsJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures, 2000
- Electrical Characterization of Ultrashallow Dopant ProfilesJournal of the Electrochemical Society, 2000
- Recent insights into the physical modeling of the spreading resistance point contactJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures, 1996
- A contact model for Poisson-based spreading resistance correction schemes incorporating Schottky barrier and pressure effectsJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures, 1992
- Spreading resistance:A quantitative tool for process control and developmentJournal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures, 1992
- Comparison of carrier profiles from spreading resistance analysis and from model calculations for abrupt doping structuresApplied Physics Letters, 1987
- The Relation Between Two‐Probe and Four‐Probe Resistances on Nonuniform StructuresJournal of the Electrochemical Society, 1984