A Single Amino Acid Substitution Changes Ribonuclease 4 from a Uridine-Specific to a Cytidine-Specific Enzyme

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The structural features underlying the strong uridine specificity of ribonuclease 4 (RNase 4) are largely unknown. It has been hypothesized that the negatively charged α-carboxylate is close to the pyrimidine binding pocket, due to a unique C-terminal deletion. This would suppress the cleavage of cytidine-containing substrates [Zhou, H.-M., and Strydom, D. J. (1993) Eur. J. Biochem. 217, 401−410]. Replacement of the α-carboxylate by an α-carboxamide in a fragment complementation system decreased both (kcat/Km)CpA and (kcat/Km)UpA , thus refuting the hypothesis. However, model building showed that the deletion allowed the side chain of Arg-101 to reach the pyrimidine binding pocket. From the 386-fold reduction in (kcat/Km)UpA in RNase 4;R101N, it is concluded that this residue functions in uridine binding, analogous to Ser-123 in RNase A. In addition, it may have an effect on Asp-80. The 2-fold increase in (kcat/Km)CpA in the mutant R101N and the close proximity of the side chains of Arg-101 and Asp-80 suggested that the latter could be involved in suppressing CpA catalysis. The substrate specificity of RNase 4;D80A was completely reversed: (kcat/Km)UpA decreased 159-fold, whereas (kcat/Km)CpA increased 233-fold. The effect on CpA was unexpected, because the corresponding residue in bovine pancreatic RNase A (Asp-83) hardly affects cytidine-containing substrates. Furthermore, the residue is conserved in nearly all sequences of mammalian RNase 1. Thus, an evolutionary highly conserved residue does not necessarily function in the same way in homologous enzymes. A model, which proposes that the structure of RNase 4 has been optimized to permanently fix the position of Asp-80 and impede its movement away from the pyrimidine binding pocket, is presented.