Experience with Robotic Lobectomy for Lung Cancer
- 1 November 2011
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery
- Vol. 6 (6) , 355-360
- https://doi.org/10.1097/imi.0b013e3182490093
Abstract
Objective In this study, we analyze our experience so far with robotic pulmonary lobectomy, compare it with published data, and suggest a learning curve for the operation. Methods Ninety-one patients with suspected or proven clinical stage I–III lung cancer underwent robotic lobectomy. Selection criteria included lesion ≤5 cm and normal respiratory function. One surgeon performed the operations using the da Vinci system with three ports and a 3-cm utility thoracotomy. Results Median duration of operation was 239 (range 85–411) minutes, 260 minutes in the first 18 patients and 221 minutes in the remaining 73 cases (P = 0.01). Median hospitalization declined from 6 days in the first 18 cases to 5 days in the remaining cases (P = 0.002). Conversion rate and number of complications reduced nonsignificantly from the initial to later series. Major complications occurred in 11% of the first 18 cases and 4% of the later cases. The number of lymph nodes removed did not change over the two series. There was no 30-day postoperative mortality. After a median follow-up of 24 months, 80 of 91 patients were alive with no sign of disease. Conclusions Our data suggest that about 20 operations are required to achieve surgical competence. Robotic lobectomy appears safe, oncologically radical, and associated with shorter postoperative hospitalization than open surgery.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Versus Open Thoracotomy Lobectomy in a Cohort of 13,619 PatientsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2010
- Pulmonary function after pulmonary resection by posterior thoracotomy, anterior thoracotomy or video-assisted surgeryEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2010
- Safety and efficacy of video-assisted versus conventional lung resection for lung cancerThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2009
- Surgery for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Versus Thoracotomy Approaches to LobectomyThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2008
- VATS Lobectomy is Better than Open Thoracotomy: What is the Evidence for Short-Term Outcomes?Thoracic Surgery Clinics, 2008
- Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery in Lung Cancer ResectionInnovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, 2007
- Thoracoscopic Lobectomy Facilitates the Delivery of Chemotherapy after Resection for Lung CancerPublished by Elsevier ,2007
- The Surgical Option for Gastroesophageal Reflux DiseaseThe American Journal of Medicine, 1997
- The learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomyThe American Journal of Surgery, 1995
- Laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomised trialThe Lancet, 1994