The Necessity and Efficiency of Wound Surveillance After Discharge
- 1 January 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of Surgery
- Vol. 127 (1) , 77-82
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420010091013
Abstract
• A surgical wound surveillance program followed up 16453 consecutive patients from 1983 through 1988. Patients were followed up for 30 days after operation, and 516 (35%) of the surgical wound infections first became manifest after discharge. In-hospital surveillance alone would have estimated the surgical wound infection rate to be 5.8% when the true rate was 8.9%. Infections that occurred after discharge were more likely in clean operations, in shorter operations, in obese patients, and in nonalcoholic patients. The probability that infections would begin after discharge was inversely associated with the duration of postoperative stay in the hospital. Postdischarge follow-up of patients who previously have undergone surgery is necessary to avoid underestimates of the infection rates and biases related to known risk factors. The most efficient time to survey patients appears to be at 21 days after the operation, at which time 90% of surgical wound infections have occurred. (Arch Surg. 1992;127:77-82)Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Continuous, 10-Year Wound Infection SurveillanceArchives of Surgery, 1990
- The Impact of Postdischarge Infection on Surgical Wound Infection RatesInfection Control, 1987
- Surgical wound infections documented after hospital dischargeAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 1987
- Effect of remote infections on clean wound infection ratesAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 1986
- Risk of wound infections in trauma patientsThe American Journal of Surgery, 1985
- Effect of methods of postdischarge wound infection surveillance on reported infection ratesAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 1983