Pazopanib in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results of a Randomized Phase III Trial
Top Cited Papers
- 20 February 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 28 (6) , 1061-1068
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.23.9764
Abstract
Purpose: Pazopanib is an oral angiogenesis inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and c-Kit. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study evaluated efficacy and safety of pazopanib monotherapy in treatment-naive and cytokine-pretreated patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Patients and Methods: Adult patients with measurable, locally advanced, and/or metastatic RCC were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive oral pazopanib or placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival, tumor response rate (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors), and safety. Radiographic assessments of tumors were independently reviewed. Results: Of 435 patients enrolled, 233 were treatment naive (54%) and 202 were cytokine pretreated (46%). PFS was significantly prolonged with pazopanib compared with placebo in the overall study population (median, PFS 9.2 v 4.2 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.62; P < .0001), the treatment-naive subpopulation (median PFS 11.1 v 2.8 months; HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.60; P < .0001), and the cytokine-pretreated subpopulation (median PFS, 7.4 v 4.2 months; HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.84; P < .001). The objective response rate was 30% with pazopanib compared with 3% with placebo (P < .001). The median duration of response was longer than 1 year. The most common adverse events were diarrhea, hypertension, hair color changes, nausea, anorexia, and vomiting. There was no evidence of clinically important differences in quality of life for pazopanib versus placebo. Conclusion: Pazopanib demonstrated significant improvement in PFS and tumor response compared with placebo in treatment-naive and cytokine-pretreated patients with advanced and/or metastatic RCC.This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bevacizumab Plus Interferon Alfa Compared With Interferon Alfa Monotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: CALGB 90206Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Efficacy of everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase III trialPublished by Elsevier ,2008
- Bevacizumab plus interferon alfa-2a for treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, double-blind phase III trialThe Lancet, 2007
- Sunitinib Efficacy Against Advanced Renal Cell CarcinomaJournal of Urology, 2007
- Temsirolimus, Interferon Alfa, or Both for Advanced Renal-Cell CarcinomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Renal cell carcinoma: Current status and emerging therapiesCancer Treatment Reviews, 2007
- Sunitinib versus Interferon Alfa in Metastatic Renal-Cell CarcinomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Sorafenib in Advanced Clear-Cell Renal-Cell CarcinomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Novel treatment strategies in clear-cell metastatic renal cell carcinomaAnti-Cancer Drugs, 2005
- The Mainz Classification of Renal Cell TumorsCancer Control, 1999