A descriptive study of the readability of patient information leaflets designed by nurses
- 1 November 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Vol. 26 (5) , 985-991
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.00455.x
Abstract
Written patient information materials can be valuable communication tools for teaching and reinforcing the verbal message, especially in the present climate of today's health service where patients are in hospital for such short times. They are only useful if the patient is able to read and understand them, otherwise they become an expensive waste of resources. Various studies have shown that many healthcare information leaflets are written at university or postgraduate level and would cause problems with understanding for many people reading them. This study set out to examine the readability of nurse‐designed written information leaflets using the Flesch Reading Ease score and the FOG and SMOG readability formulae. This descriptive study used a sample of 24 leaflets designed by trained nurses in a large teaching hospital. The results produced a mean grade of 11.3 with a range of 8.9 to 14.8. This was similar to the results of other studies and meant that patients may have difficulty comprehending the information. It would appear that little progress has been made in 40 years in this area and potential reasons are discussed. Advantages and disadvantages of readability formulae and other guidelines available for developing information leaflets are explored. Recommendations for further research are made.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- WHAT MR. CONNOR COULDNʼT SAYNursing2021, 1994
- Designing and evaluating printed education materials: Model and instrument developmentPatient Education and Counseling, 1991
- Comprehension levels of patients reading health informationPatient Education and Counseling, 1991
- Readability formulas: Cautions and criteriaPatient Education and Counseling, 1991
- A Simple Guide for Design, Use, and Evaluation of Educational MaterialsHealth Education Quarterly, 1991
- Writing Patient Education MaterialsOrthopaedic Nursing, 1989
- Asthma information: can it be understood?Health Education Research, 1989
- Can Clients Understand Our Instructions?Image: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 1986
- Readability formulas may mislead youPatient Education and Counseling, 1985
- Consent Forms, Readability, and Comprehension: The Need for New Assessment ToolsLaw, Medicine and Health Care, 1985