The Cord-Blood-Bank Controversies
- 25 November 2004
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 351 (22) , 2255-2257
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp048283
Abstract
Umbilical-cord blood is increasingly used as a source of stem cells to repopulate the bone marrow in the treatment of life-threatening diseases in children and adults (as discussed in this issue of the Journal by Laughlin et al., pages 2265–2275, Rocha et al., pages 2276–2285, and Sanz, pages 2328–2330). This scientific progress, however, has triggered a continuing debate about how to organize cord-blood banks and the role of public and private facilities.The blood that remains in the placenta after birth is readily available, can be collected at no risk to the mother or newborn, and may be stored frozen . . .Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transplants of Umbilical-Cord Blood or Bone Marrow from Unrelated Donors in Adults with Acute LeukemiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Outcomes after Transplantation of Cord Blood or Bone Marrow from Unrelated Donors in Adults with LeukemiaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Cord-Blood Transplantation in Patients with Leukemia — A Real Alternative for AdultsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Hematopoietic Reconstitution in a Patient with Fanconi's Anemia by Means of Umbilical-Cord Blood from an HLA-Identical SiblingNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989