Dilemmas in linking succession planning to individual executive learning
- 1 June 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Human Resource Management
- Vol. 25 (2) , 235-265
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.3930250206
Abstract
This paper examines the issue of linking the selection of top‐level executives with the development of these people. It first describes three stages in an organization's development of a succession system which promotes the attainment of a firm's objectives: 1) oneposition staffing, 2) replacement planning, and 3) succession planning. Then we examine the other piece to be connected to succession planning: executive learning. It is argued that most planned executive development is aimed at task learning, not personal learning. Consistent with this condition, most executive education activities overstress classroomstyle receptive methods, while neglecting active learning. Reasons for this state of affairs are proposed. The paper concludes with recommendations for enhancing personal learning for executives and for better integrating this learning with the strategic succession planning of the organization. This sort of strategic approach to executive succession is seen as the “acid test” in a firm's strategic planning process.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Matching managers to strategies: Point and counterpointHuman Resource Management, 1986
- Succession systems in large corporations: Characteristics and correlates of performanceHuman Resource Management, 1986
- Project work as an antidote to career plateauing in a declining engineering organizationHuman Resource Management, 1985
- Warning: The fast track may be hazardous to organizational healthOrganizational Dynamics, 1985
- High hurdles: The challenge of executive self-developmentPublished by Center for Creative Leadership ,1985
- The Evolving SelfPublished by Harvard University Press ,1982
- Surprise and Sense Making: What Newcomers Experience in Entering Unfamiliar Organizational SettingsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1980