Analysis of Acorus calamus Chloroplast Genome and Its Phylogenetic Implications
Open Access
- 1 June 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Molecular Biology and Evolution
- Vol. 22 (9) , 1813-1822
- https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msi173
Abstract
Determining the phylogenetic relationships among the major lines of angiosperms is a long-standing problem, yet the uncertainty as to the phylogenetic affinity of these lines persists. While a number of studies have suggested that the ANITA (Amborella-Nymphaeales-Illiciales-Trimeniales-Aristolochiales) grade is basal within angiosperms, studies of complete chloroplast genome sequences also suggested an alternative tree, wherein the line leading to the grasses branches first among the angiosperms. To improve taxon sampling in the existing chloroplast genome data, we sequenced the chloroplast genome of the monocot Acorus calamus. We generated a concatenated alignment (89,436 positions for 15 taxa), encompassing almost all sequences usable for phylogeny reconstruction within spermatophytes. The data still contain support for both the ANITA-basal and grasses-basal hypotheses. Using simulations we can show that were the ANITA-basal hypothesis true, parsimony (and distance-based methods with many models) would be expected to fail to recover it. The self-evident explanation for this failure appears to be a long-branch attraction (LBA) between the clade of grasses and the out-group. However, this LBA cannot explain the discrepancies observed between tree topology recovered using the maximum likelihood (ML) method and the topologies recovered using the parsimony and distance-based methods when grasses are deleted. Furthermore, the fact that neither maximum parsimony nor distance methods consistently recover the ML tree, when according to the simulations they would be expected to, when the out-group (Pinus) is deleted, suggests that either the generating tree is not correct or the best symmetric model is misspecified (or both). We demonstrate that the tree recovered under ML is extremely sensitive to model specification and that the best symmetric model is misspecified. Hence, we remain agnostic regarding phylogenetic relationships among basal angiosperm lineages.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Covarion Structure in Plastid Genome Evolution: A New Statistical TestMolecular Biology and Evolution, 2005
- Araceae from the Early Cretaceous of Portugal: Evidence on the emergence of monocotyledonsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2004
- Complete Nucleotide Sequence of the Sugarcane (Saccharum Officinarum) Chloroplast Genome: A Comparative Analysis of Four Monocot Chloroplast GenomesDNA Research, 2004
- The chloroplast genome of the ?basal? angiosperm Calycanthus fertilis ? structural and phylogenetic analysesÖsterreichische botanische Zeitschrift, 2003
- 18S gene trees are positively misleading for monocot/dicot phylogeneticsMolecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2003
- Analysis of the Amborella trichopoda Chloroplast Genome Sequence Suggests That Amborella Is Not a Basal AngiospermMolecular Biology and Evolution, 2003
- Base-Calling of Automated Sequencer Traces UsingPhred. I. Accuracy AssessmentGenome Research, 1998
- AcoraceaePublished by Springer Nature ,1998
- Noncoding sequences from the slowly evolving chloroplast inverted repeat in addition to rbcL data do not support gnetalean affinities of angiospermsMolecular Biology and Evolution, 1996
- Phylogenetic analysis of rbcL sequences identifies Acorus calamus as the primal extant monocotyledon.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1993