Some Conventional Orthodoxies in the Study of Agrarian Change
- 1 January 1984
- journal article
- Published by Project MUSE in World Politics
- Vol. 36 (2) , 234-254
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2010233
Abstract
The paper presents a critical review of two major approaches to the analysis of agrarian societies in light of evidence taken from the scholarly literature on Africa. The first approach posits the existence of “natural” societies; the second, of “peasant” societies. The existence of such “precapitalist” societies is often invoked to account for patterns of change in contemporary rural societies. The author argues that these approaches are overly culturally and economically determined, and that they undervalue the importance of the state. Many of the so-called precapitalist features of these societies are themselves found to be products of the societies' encounter with agents of capitalism. Moreover, many result from the efforts of states to secure domination and control over rural populations.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Underdevelopment, Modes of Production, and the State in Colonial GhanaAfrican Studies Review, 1981
- Beyond Ujamaa in TanzaniaPublished by University of California Press ,1980
- The Rational PeasantPublished by University of California Press ,1979
- Peasants as a Focus in African StudiesAfrican Studies Review, 1977
- Capitalism and cheap labour-power in South Africa: from segregation to apartheid1Economy and Society, 1972
- ‘Peasantization’ and Rural Political Movements in Western AfricaEuropean Journal of Sociology, 1972
- Colonial Chiefs in Chiefless SocietiesThe Journal of Modern African Studies, 1971
- Closed Corporate Peasant Communities in Mesoamerica and Central JavaSouthwestern Journal of Anthropology, 1957
- Types of Latin American Peasantry: A Preliminary Discussion*American Anthropologist, 1955