Caution Regarding the Use of Pilot Studies to Guide Power Calculations for Study Proposals
Top Cited Papers
- 1 May 2006
- journal article
- perspectives
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of General Psychiatry
- Vol. 63 (5) , 484-489
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.63.5.484
Abstract
Clinical researchers often propose (or review committees demand) pilot studies to determine whether a study is worth performing and to guide power calculations. The most likely outcomes are that (1) studies worth performing are aborted and (2) studies that are not aborted are underpowered. There are many excellent reasons for performing pilot studies. The argument herein is not meant to discourage clinical researchers from performing pilot studies (or review committees from requiring them) but simply to caution against their use for the objective of guiding power calculations.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Size of Treatment Effects and Their Importance to Clinical Research and PracticeBiological Psychiatry, 2006
- Probabilistic index: an intuitive non‐parametric approach to measuring the size of treatment effectsStatistics in Medicine, 2005
- Which Alzheimer Patients Are at Risk for Rapid Cognitive Decline?Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 2002
- Post Hoc Power Analysis: An Idea Whose Time Has Passed?Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, 2001
- Calculating the number needed to treat for trials where the outcome is time to an eventBMJ, 1999
- Needed: A Ban on the Significance TestPsychological Science, 1997
- Should Significance Tests be Banned? Introduction to a Special Section Exploring the Pros and ConsPsychological Science, 1997
- The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effectBMJ, 1995