Diagnostic Validity for Different Components of Pattern Shift Visual Evoked Potentials in Multiple Sclerosis
- 1 January 1979
- journal article
- research article
- Published by S. Karger AG in European Neurology
- Vol. 18 (4) , 243-248
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000115083
Abstract
Visual evoked potentials, elicited by checkerboard-pattern reversal were recorded from multiple sclerosis patients with different probabilities of diagnosis. Latencies and amplitudes of the different components were analyzed for diagnostic validity. Latency of the main positive peak (P2) was the most sensitive parameter; in a few cases determination of P2 latency and interocular difference of this peak alone failed to detect involvement of the visual system. Additional evaluation of absolute latencies, asymmetries in latency and amplitudes of other components would give evidence in predicting abnormalities of the visual pathways.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of luminence on the pattern visual evoked potential in multiple sclerosisElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1978
- Visual evoked responses in multiple sclerosis: comparison of two methods for pattern reversal.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1978
- Visual evoked responses and visual symptoms in multiple sclerosisJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1978
- Pattern-reversal visual evoked potentialJournal of the Neurological Sciences, 1978
- Pnntern Shift Visual Evoked ResponsesArchives of Neurology, 1978
- Pattern reversal evoked visual potential in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1977
- Visual pattern evoked responses and blink reflexes in assessment of MS diagnosisZeitschrift für Neurologie, 1976