Problems of diagnosis and legal causation in courtroom use of post‐traumatic stress disorder
- 1 June 1983
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Behavioral Sciences & the Law
- Vol. 1 (3) , 115-130
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2370010311
Abstract
Serious problems with the diagnosis of Post‐Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) render it vulnerable to legal challenge and subject to abuse. Problems in legal causation are outlined and include the issues of prior susceptibility, identification of the stressor, symptom assessment, intervening factors, and criminal responsibility.Trial courts continue to question the admissibility of PTSD expert witness testimony. To ensure the continuing validity of PTSD, its use should be limited, and expert witness testimony increasingly supported by empirically based research data.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessment of Viet Nam veterans for posttraumatic stress disorder in Veterans Administration disability claimsAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1982
- The effects of rape on marital and sexual adjustmentThe American Journal of Family Therapy, 1982
- Traumatic neurosis in the etiology of alcoholism: Viet Nam combat and other traumaAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1980
- Sharing the crisis of rape: Counseling the mates and families of victims.Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery, 1978
- Drs. Titchener and Kapp ReplyAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1976
- Disaster at Buffalo Creek. Discussion of the Buffalo Creek disaster: the course of psychic traumaAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1976
- Disaster at Buffalo Creek. From chaos to responsibilityAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1976
- Traumatic Neuroses in Vietnam ReturneesArchives of General Psychiatry, 1973
- Unhappy OdysseysArchives of General Psychiatry, 1969
- Traumatic Neuroses in CourtVirginia Law Review, 1943