Moral Hazard and Optimal Subsidiary Structure for Financial Institutions
- 1 December 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Finance
- Vol. 59 (6) , 2531-2575
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00708.x
Abstract
Banks and related financial institutions often have two separate subsidiaries that make loans of similar type but differing risk, for example, a bank and a finance company, or a “good bank/bad bank” structure. Such “bipartite” structures may prevent risk shifting, in which banks misuse their flexibility in choosing and monitoring loans to exploit their debt holders. By “insulating” safer loans from riskier loans, a bipartite structure reduces risk‐shifting incentives in the safer subsidiary. Bipartite structures are more likely to dominate unitary structures as the downside from riskier loans is higher or as expected profits from the efficient loan mix are lower.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Credit Card Securitization and Regulatory ArbitrageSSRN Electronic Journal, 2003
- What is the Value of Recourse to Asset Backed Securities? A Clinical Study of Credit Card BanksSSRN Electronic Journal, 2003
- Moral Hazard and Optimal Subsidiary Structure for Financial InstitutionsSSRN Electronic Journal, 2001
- Market Discipline and Incentive Problems in Conglomerate Firms with Applications to BankingJournal of Financial Intermediation, 2000
- Equity, Bonds, and Bank Debt: Capital Structure and Financial Market Equilibrium under Asymmetric InformationJournal of Political Economy, 2000
- The Paradox of LiquidityThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1998
- Of Firewalls and Subsidiaries: The Right Stuff for Expanded Bank ActivitiesSSRN Electronic Journal, 1998
- Spinoffs and InformationJournal of Financial Intermediation, 1997
- Optimal Incorporation, Structure of Debt Contracts, and Limited-Recourse Project FinancingJournal of Financial Intermediation, 1996
- Moral Hazard and ObservabilityThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1979