Peer Review in Prague
- 15 July 1998
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA)
- Vol. 280 (3) , 214-215
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.3.214
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reliability of Editors' Subjective Quality Ratings of Peer Reviews of ManuscriptsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1998
- Positive-Outcome Bias and Other Limitations in the Outcome of Research Abstracts Submitted to a Scientific MeetingJAMA, 1998
- Reporting of Randomized Clinical Trial Descriptors and Use of Structured AbstractsJAMA, 1998
- Perceived value of providing peer reviewers with abstracts and preprints of related published and unpublished papers.JAMA, 1998
- What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?JAMA, 1998
- Masking, Blinding, and Peer Review: The Blind Leading the BlindedAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1998
- Nepotism and sexism in peer-reviewNature, 1997
- Peer review. Crude and understudied, but indispensablePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1994
- Chance and Consensus in Peer ReviewScience, 1981