Tumour‐associated macrophages and melanoma tumourigenesis: integrating the complexity
- 18 May 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Experimental Pathology
- Vol. 87 (3) , 163-176
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2613.2006.00478.x
Abstract
When the body discovers a tumour cell (foreign antigen), several kinds of mechanisms and cells operate in what is called an immune response. The latter has evolved into two mechanisms: non-specific immunity and specific immunity, which are closely linked to and influence each other. The former represents the first line of defence against neoplastic cells. The adaptive (specific) immunity is orchestrated by antigen-specific T and B lymphocytes. The effector cells of innate immunity include granulocytes, macrophages and natural killer cells. Among these cells, macrophages represent the most important part of innate immunity against tumours. Tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs) are important antigen-presenting cells and as such an understanding of their interactions with tumour cells gives insights into novel therapeutic strategies. In tumours, the effect of TAMs is the outcome of their two concomitantly competing interactions: tumour growth reduction and tumour growth promotion. The macrophage (TAMs) content of melanoma ranges from 0 to 30% and their density increases with increasing tumour thickness. The melanoma cells and TAMs seem to interact with each other through the release of soluble factors that either prevent or enhance tumour growth. For instance, syngeneic macrophages from tumour-bearing mice can inhibit melanoma growth in the nude mice more than the control macrophages. Alternatively, metastatic B16 melanoma cells can produce some macrophage cytotoxic substances that help tumour cells not only escape the host immunosurveillance system but also prevent distant metastasis. Together, these observations suggest opposing effects for these soluble factors in melanoma. To date, little is available in the literature about the interactions between TAMs and melanoma cells. This viewpoint not only tries to examine these interactions but also provides relevant speculations.Keywords
This publication has 79 references indexed in Scilit:
- Soluble branched (1,4)‐β‐D‐glucans from Acetobacter species enhance antitumor activities against MHC class I‐negative and ‐positive malignant melanoma through augmented NK activity and cytotoxic T‐cell responseInternational Journal of Cancer, 2005
- Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor MIF Interferes with the Rb-E2F PathwayMolecular Cell, 2005
- Evidence of macrophage and lymphocyte, but not dendritic cell, infiltration in posterior uveal melanomas, whilst cultured uveal melanomas demonstrate pluripotency by expressing CD68 and CD163International Journal of Experimental Pathology, 2004
- Anti-Metastatic activity of glycoprotein fractionated fromacanthopanax senticosus, involvement of NK-cell and macrophage activationArchives of Pharmacal Research, 2004
- Peptide‐specific CD8+ T‐cell evolution in vivo: Response to peptide vaccination with Melan‐A/MART‐1International Journal of Cancer, 2002
- Human monocyte×mouse melanoma fusion hybrids express human geneGene, 2001
- Co‐expression of Thymidine Phosphorylase and Heme Oxygenase‐1 in Macrophages in Human Malignant Vertical Growth MelanomasJapanese Journal of Cancer Research, 2000
- Signals and signs for lymphocyte responsesCell, 1994
- The origin and function of tumor-associated macrophagesImmunology Today, 1992
- The Effects of Tumor Facilitating Factor of B16 Melanoma on the MacrophageJournal of Investigative Dermatology, 1983