THE APPENDIX STUMP - SHOULD IT BE INVAGINATED
- 1 January 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Vol. 66 (2) , 92-93
Abstract
In a prospective trial of 103 patients undergoing appendicectomy, one group of patients had the appendix stump treated by ligation alone and the other group underwent ligation and invagination. The 2 groups of patients were similar with respect to age, sex, incision and degree of inflammation of the appendix. Perforated appendices were excluded and in neither group were drains used or antibiotics given. No significant difference between the 2 methods of treatment of the appendix stump was noted, either with respect to wound infection or postoperative stay in hospital.This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Short term metronidazole therapy contrasted with povidone-iodine spray in the prevention of wound infection after appendicectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1979
- A double-blind trial of a single intravenous dose of metronidazole as prophylaxis against wound infection following appendicectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1979
- Intrarectal metronidazole in the prevention of anaerobic infections after emergency appendicectomy: A controlled clinical trialBritish Journal of Surgery, 1979
- Appendicectomy: An assessment of the advisability of stump invaginationBritish Journal of Surgery, 1977
- Prophylactic lincomycin in the prevention of wound infection following appendicectomy: A double blind studyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1976
- Metronidazole in prevention and treatment of bacteroides infections after appendicectomy.BMJ, 1976
- The effect of diathermy to the appendix stump in the control of wound sepsis.1974
- Aetiology and prevention of wound infection in appendicectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1974
- Some observations on appendicectomy with particular reference to techniqueBritish Journal of Surgery, 1969
- Appendectomy: ligation of appendiceal stump without cauterization.1968