Long‐term (96‐week) follow‐up of antiretroviral‐naïve HIV‐infected patients treated with first‐line lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy in the MONARK trial*
Open Access
- 4 January 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in HIV Medicine
- Vol. 11 (2) , 137-142
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1293.2009.00752.x
Abstract
Background: The toxicities, cost and complexity of triple combinations warrant the search for other treatment options, such as boosted protease inhibitor (PI) monotherapy. MONotherapy AntiRetroviral Kaletra (MONARK) is the first randomized trial comparing lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy to triple combination therapy with zidovudine/lamivudine and lopinavir/ritonavir in antiretroviral‐naïve patients.Methods: A total of 136 antiretroviral‐naïve patients, with a CD4 cell count above 100 cells/μL and a plasma HIV RNA below 100 000 HIV‐1 RNA copies/mL, were randomized and dosed with either lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy (n=83) or lopinavir/ritonavir+zidovudine/lamivudine (n=53). We focus here on patients in the lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy arm followed to week 96. The intent‐to‐treat (ITT) analysis initially involved all patients randomized to lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy (n=83), and then focused on patients who had an HIV RNA n=56).Results: At week 96, 39 of 83 patients (47%) had HIV RNA 400 copies/mL. Focusing on the 56 patients with an HIV RNA <50 copies/mL at week 48, 38 of 56 patients (68%) had a sustained HIV RNA <50 copies/mL to week 96. To week 96, a total of 28 patients (34%) had discontinued the study treatment. In addition, the allocated treatment was changed for seven patients. PI‐associated resistance mutations were evident in five of 83 patients in the monotherapy arm from baseline to week 96.Conclusion: By ITT analysis, 39 of the 83 patients initially randomized to lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy had HIV RNA <50 copies/mL at week 96. The occurrence in some patients of low‐level viraemia (50–500 copies/mL) may increase the risk of drug resistance. First‐line lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy cannot be systematically recommended.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Protease Inhibitor Resistance Analysis in the MONARK Trial Comparing First-Line Lopinavir-Ritonavir Monotherapy to Lopinavir-Ritonavir plus Zidovudine and Lamivudine Triple TherapyAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2009
- A 96‐Week Comparison of Lopinavir‐Ritonavir Combination Therapy Followed by Lopinavir‐Ritonavir Monotherapy versus Efavirenz Combination TherapyThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2008
- Absence of HIV-1 shedding in male genital tract after 1 year of first-line lopinavir/ritonavir alone or in combination with zidovudine/lamivudineJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2008
- Lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy or plus zidovudine and lamivudine in antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patientsAIDS, 2008
- Lopinavir-ritonavir monotherapy versus lopinavir-ritonavir and two nucleosides for maintenance therapy of HIVAIDS, 2008
- Lopinavir with Ritonavir Reduces the HIV RNA Level in Cerebrospinal FluidClinical Infectious Diseases, 2007
- Potential Risks and Benefits of HIV Treatment Simplification: A Simulation Model of a Proposed Clinical TrialClinical Infectious Diseases, 2007
- Overview of boosted protease inhibitors in treatment-experienced HIV-infected patientsJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2007
- Benefits and concerns of simplification strategies in HIV-infected patientsJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2006
- Resistance profiles observed in virological failures after 24 weeks of amprenavir/ritonavir containing regimen in protease inhibitor experienced patientsJournal of Medical Virology, 2004