What's Wrong With Performance Appraisals? A Critique and A Suggestion
- 1 March 1993
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Human Resource Management Journal
- Vol. 3 (3) , 61-77
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.1993.tb00316.x
Abstract
Keith Grint, who is a Fellow in Organizational Behaviour at Templeton College, Oxford, offers a critical evaluation of performance appraisal systems. He argues that the traditional criticism of appraisals – their subjectivity – leads to a fruitless search for ever more objective appraisal criteria that are illusory. the consequence need not be that appraisals should be abandoned but they should be treated much more sceptically and reflexively. In particular, he suggests, there are strong arguments for supplementing traditional downward appraisals of subordinates with upward appraisals of superordinates.This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Subordinate Views in Supervisory Conflict Situations: Peering into the Subcultural ChasmHuman Relations, 1992
- PAY, CONTROL AND COMMITMENT: LINKING APPRAISAL AND REWARDHuman Resource Management Journal, 1992
- PERFORMANCE RELATED PAY: OBJECTIVES AND APPLICATIONHuman Resource Management Journal, 1992
- PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IN PRACTICEHuman Resource Management Journal, 1992
- The Relevance of Leadership Variables for Performance AppraisalPersonnel Review, 1989
- Mood, categorization breadth, and performance appraisal: The effects of order of information acquisition and affective state on halo, accuracy, information retrieval, and evaluationsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1988
- An analysis of managers' reactions to their own performance appraisal feedback.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1988
- Systems Model of the Performance Appraisal Interview ProcessIndustrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 1987
- Characteristics of Effective Appraisal InterviewsPersonnel Review, 1987
- COMPARISONS OF MANAGERIAL AND EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION WITH A PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEMPersonnel Psychology, 1983