Adjusted indirect comparison may be less biased than direct comparison for evaluating new pharmaceutical interventions

This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:

• Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence
  BMJ, 2005
• Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses
  BMJ, 2003
• Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis
  Statistics in Medicine, 2002
• Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials
  BMJ, 2001
• The double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2001
• Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?
  Published by Elsevier ,1998
• Risperidone in the treatment of schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
  Journal of Psychopharmacology, 1997
• Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials
  JAMA, 1995
• Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: meta-analysis of efficacy and acceptability.
  BMJ, 1993
• Side Effects and Placebo Amplification
  The British Journal of Psychiatry, 1982