Contact dermatitis from acrylate and methacrylate compounds in Lowicryl® embedding media for electron microscopy
- 1 August 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Contact Dermatitis
- Vol. 23 (2) , 96-102
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.1990.tb03230.x
Abstract
This report is about occupational contact dermatitis found in 3 out of 6 workers of a chemistry laboratory using Lowicryl® embedding media, which contain (meth)acrylate monomer mixtures of known composition. The notation (meth) acrylates is used to refer to both acrylates and methacrylates. (Meth) acrylate monomers will polymerize in the absence of oxygen when induced by metal ions, peroxides, heat or ultraviolet light. The monomers are of low viscosity and remain in the liquid stale at temperatures far below 0°C. The volatile compounds, some of which exhibit a most pungent odour, have a tendency to penetrate all tissue and to permeate into the finest fissures, a properly which makes them suitable as sealants, glues, embedding material, etc. This and their toxicity may represent a danger to (he health of individuals who need to work with them, especially if no precautions are taken We show with putch testing that one patient reacted strongly to the compound 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate at the dilutions tested (0.5 and 1% v/v), but not at all to 10 other (meth)acrylates. In the same lest. 3 volunteer controls were negative to 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate, We demonstrate that at maximum working concentration, 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate penetrates both latex and vinyl gloves and elicits irritant allergic reactions on the patient and irritant reactions on a control. Finally, we discuss the necessary protective measures.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Structure‐activity relationships for skin sensitisation potential of diacrylates and dimethacrylatesContact Dermatitis, 1987
- Protective effect of barrier creams and spray coatings against epoxy resinsContact Dermatitis, 1987
- Developments of new Lowicryl® resins for embedding biological specimens at even lower temperaturesJournal of Microscopy, 1986
- Contact dermatitis to anaerobic sealantsJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1985
- Sensitizing potential of 2‐hydroxyethylmethacrylateContact Dermatitis, 1985
- Contact sensitivity to acrylate compounds in guinea pigsContact Dermatitis, 1983
- Epoxy resins are mutagenic: Implications for electron microscopistsJournal of Ultrastructure Research, 1982
- Sensitizing potential of 14 mono (meth) acrylates in the guinea pig*Contact Dermatitis, 1982
- Recently reported causes of contact dermatitis due to synthetic resins and hardenersContact Dermatitis, 1979
- Sensitivity to epoxy resins and triethylenetetramineContact Dermatitis, 1976