US women's attitudes to false-positive mammography results and detection of ductal carcinoma in situ: cross-sectional survey
- 1 November 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Western Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 173 (5) , 307-312
- https://doi.org/10.1136/ewjm.173.5.307
Abstract
Objective To determine women's attitudes and knowledge of both false-positive mammography results and the detection of ductal carcinoma in situ after screening mammography. Design Cross-sectional survey. Setting United States. Participants A total of 479 women aged 18 ro 97 years who did nor report a history of breast cancer. Main outcome measures Attitudes and knowledge about false-positive results and the detection of ductal carcinoma in situ after screening mammography. Results Women were aware that false-positive results do occur. Their median estimate of the false-positive rate for 10 years of annual screening was 20% (25th percentile estimate, 10%; 75th percentile estimate, 45%). The women were highly tolerant of false-positive results: 63% thought that 500 or more false-positives per life saved was reasonable, and 37% would tolerate a rate of 10,000 or more. Women who had had a false-positive result (n = 76) expressed the same high tolerance: 30 (39%) would tolerate 10,000 or more false-positives. In all, 62% of women did not want to take false-positive results into account when deciding about screening. Only 8% of women thought that mammography could harm a woman without breast cancer, and 94% doubted the possibility of nonprogressive breast cancers. Few had heard of ductal carcinoma in situ, a cancer that may not progress, but when informed, 60% of women wanted ro take into account the possibility of it being detected when deciding about screening. Conclusions Women are aware of false-positive results and seem to view them as an acceptable consequence of screening mammography. In contrast, most women are unaware that screening can detect cancers that may never progress but think that such information would be relevant. Education should perhaps focus less on false-positive results and more on the less-familiar outcome of die detection of ductal carcinoma in situ.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- A New Scale for Assessing Perceptions of ChanceMedical Decision Making, 2000
- Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable?The Lancet, 2000
- False-Positive Screening Mammograms: Good News, but More To DoAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1999
- Ten-Year Risk of False Positive Screening Mammograms and Clinical Breast ExaminationsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- Lessons from the Mammography Screening Controversy: Can We Improve the Debate?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- Using Autopsy Series To Estimate the Disease “Reservoir” for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast: How Much More Breast Cancer Can We Find?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- Neglected aspects of false positive findings of mammography in breast cancer screening: analysis of false positive cases from the Stockholm trialBMJ, 1996
- Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trialsThe Lancet, 1993
- Psychological and Behavioral Implications of Abnormal MammogramsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1991
- Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening.Health Psychology, 1991