Representativeness versus translucency: different theoretical backgrounds, but are they really different concepts? a position paper
- 1 January 1991
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Augmentative and Alternative Communication
- Vol. 7 (1) , 51-58
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07434619112331275683
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The effects of representativeness and concreteness on the “guessability” of BlissymbolsAugmentative and Alternative Communication, 1988
- A study of physical and semantic characteristics of a graphic symbol system as predictors of perceived complexityAugmentative and Alternative Communication, 1987
- An Initial Investigation of Translucency, Transparency, and Component Complexity of BlissymbolicsJournal of Childhool Communication Disorders, 1985
- An investigation of two variables influencing Blissymbol learnability with nonhandicapped adultsAugmentative and Alternative Communication, 1985
- Manual Sign Translucency and Referential Concreteness in the Learning of SignsSign Language Studies, 1981
- Why Are Signed Languages Easier to Learn than Spoken Languages? Part TwoBulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 1978
- TWO FACES OF SIGN: ICONIC AND ABSTRACT*Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1976