A Bayesian Account of Independent Evidence with Applications
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Philosophy of Science
- Vol. 68 (S3) , S123-S140
- https://doi.org/10.1086/392903
Abstract
A Bayesian account of independent evidential support is outlined. This account is partly inspired by the work of C. S. Peirce. I show that a large class of quantitative Bayesian measures of confirmation satisfy some basic desiderata suggested by Peirce for adequate accounts of independent evidence. I argue that, by considering further natural constraints on a probabilistic account of independent evidence, all but a very small class of Bayesian measures of confirmation can be ruled out. In closing, another application of my account to the problem of evidential diversity is also discussed.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Plurality of Bayesian Measures of Confirmation and the Problem of Measure SensitivityPhilosophy of Science, 1999
- Measuring ConfirmationThe Journal of Philosophy, 1999
- Bayesianism and Diverse Evidence: A Reply to Andrew WaynePhilosophy of Science, 1996
- Wayne, Horwich, and Evidential DiversityPhilosophy of Science, 1996
- Bayes and Bust: Simplicity as a Problem for a Probabilist's Approach to ConfirmationThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1995
- Bayesian Confirmation: Paradise RegainedThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1994
- In Defense of the Popper-Miller ArgumentPhilosophy of Science, 1986
- The Relevance Criterion of ConfirmationThe British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1969
- Degree of Factual SupportPhilosophy of Science, 1952
- On Inductive LogicPhilosophy of Science, 1945