How Accurate is Current TKR Instrumentation?

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Mechanical total knee replacement (TKR) alignment systems have fundamental limitations that limit their ultimate accuracy. This study uses an image-free computer-assisted navigation system to assess the accuracy of a currently available conventional mechanical, intramedullary instrumentation system. Mechanical instrumentation allows reasonably accurate and reproducible (within 3° varus-valgus) frontal and sagittal limb alignment. There is a tendency to leave the knee in slight flexion, to hyperextend the femoral component and to posteriorly tilt the tibial implant with mechanical AP guides. There also is a consistent tendency to internally rotate the femoral implant. Although almost all of the 20 TKRs resulted in final limb alignment within 3° of the frontal and sagittal mechanical axes, only four TKRs were done in which all of the measured steps were within 3° of the optimal positions. If implant longevity, pain-relief, and function are related to the accuracy with which TKRs are done, this study emphasizes that current mechanical instrumentation does not result in a high incidence of accuracy when each step of the procedure is measured. Computer-assisted techniques permit measurement of the steps of the TKRs procedure with a high degree (error < 1°) of accuracy.

This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit: