INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS: SURVEYING THE ‘OLD’ AND THE ‘NEW’
- 1 February 1993
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Metroeconomica
- Vol. 44 (1) , 1-28
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-999x.1993.tb00786.x
Abstract
This paper surveys and compares the literature on the ‘new’ institutionalism (North, Williamson, etc.) with that of the ‘old’(Veblen, Commons, Mitchell). A criterion for distinguishing these two schools is suggested, along with criticisms of the limitations of each. The ‘new’ institutionalism is associated with methodological individualism and the idea that the individual should be taken as given. Particular attention is paid to ‘new’ institutionalist treatments of markets and firms. The paper moves on to examine some ‘old’ institutionalist criticisms of ‘economic man’ as well as some negative features of the ‘old’ institutionalism. On the positive side, the latter is seen to have an ‘evolutionary’ dimension, related to modern work in the area of technological change.Keywords
This publication has 66 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Next Hundred YearsThe Economic Journal, 1991
- Contrasting origins of the two institutionalisms: the social science contextReview of Political Economy, 1989
- Carl Menger's evolutionary and John R. Commons' collective action approach to institutions: a comparisonReview of Political Economy, 1989
- What is wrong with the new institutional economics (and what is still wrong with the old)?Review of Political Economy, 1989
- What was wrong with the old institutional economics (and what is still wrong with the new)?Review of Political Economy, 1989
- Institutional economic theory: the old versus the newReview of Political Economy, 1989
- The Relative/Absolute Nature of Knowledge and Economic AnalysisThe Economic Journal, 1987
- Uncertainty and Economic AnalysisThe Economic Journal, 1985
- On Austrian methodologySynthese, 1977
- The Problem of Social CostThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1960