In vitro comparison of the two hard-hard articulations for total hip replacements

Top Cited Papers
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Polyethylene particle disease is one of the major causes of late aseptic loosening of total hip replacement. Two hard-hard articulations (alumina-on-alumina and metal-on-metal) have been developed in Europe as an alternative to the ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) articulations. Even though these hard-hard articulations are on the market and numerous reports have been published about them, only a very limited number of studies allowing a direct in vitro comparison of the two articulations have been published so far. This paper compares in vitro these two types of articulation (alumina-on-alumina and metal-on-metal), which have been tested with a hip simulator for their tribological behaviour using exactly the same experimental methodology. This comparison shows that these two types of hard-hard articulation have very similar abrasive wear behaviour with four main features: 1. A running-in wear period (1 × 106 cycles) gives a cumulative wear of about 20 μm with head diameters of 28 mm. 2. After the running-in wear, there is a stabilization of the linear wear behaviour with a low linear wear rate/106 cycles for both types of articulation. 3. The volumetric wear rate of both articulations (3/year for head diameters of 28mm) is significantly lower than that observed for metal-on-polyethylene or ceramic-on-polyethylene articulations having the same head diameter. 4. Abrasive wear is readily apparent (indicating a mixed lubrication regime) with both types of articulation. The extremely low wear performance of these articulations is confirmed and they constitute a lowwear alternative to the UHMWPE articulations currently used.

This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit: