Wide variation in cardiopulmonary resuscitation interruption intervals among commercially available automated external defibrillators may affect survival despite high defibrillation efficacy
- 1 September 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 32 (Supplement) , S421-S424
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000134265.35871.2b
Abstract
Recent studies have associated interruptions of cardiopulmonary resuscitation imposed by automated external defibrillators (AEDs) with poor resuscitation outcome. In particular, the “hands-off” interval between precordial compressions and subsequent defibrillation shock has been implicated. We sought to determine the range of variation among current-generation AEDs with respect to this characteristic. Seven AEDs from six manufacturers were characterized via stopwatch and arrhythmia simulator with respect to the imposed hands-off interval. All AEDs were equipped with new batteries, and measurements were repeated five times for each AED. A wide variation in the hands-off interval between precordial compressions and shock delivery was observed, ranging from 5.2 to 28.4 secs, with only one AED achieving an interruption of <10 secs. Laboratory and clinical data suggest that this range of variation could be responsible for a more than two-fold variation in patient resuscitation success, an effect that far exceeds any defibrillation efficacy differences that may hypothetically exist. In addition to defibrillation waveform and dose, researchers should consider the hands-off cardiopulmonary resuscitation interruption interval between cardiopulmonary resuscitation and subsequent defibrillation shock to be an important covariate of outcome in resuscitation studies. Defibrillator design should minimize this interval to avoid potential adverse consequences on patient survival.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- VF recurrence: characteristics and patient outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrestPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- The critical importance of minimal delay between chest compressions and subsequent defibrillation: a haemodynamic explanationResuscitation, 2003
- Public Use of Automated External DefibrillatorsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Refibrillation, resuscitation and survival in out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest victims treated with biphasic automated external defibrillatorsPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- Tripling Survival From Sudden Cardiac Arrest Via Early Defibrillation Without Traditional Education in Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationCirculation, 2002
- Adverse Outcomes of Interrupted Precordial Compression During Automated DefibrillationCirculation, 2002
- Effects of Interrupting Precordial Compressions on the Calculated Probability of Defibrillation Success During Out-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestCirculation, 2002
- Use of Automated External Defibrillators by a U.S. AirlineNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Outcomes of Rapid Defibrillation by Security Officers after Cardiac Arrest in CasinosNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Adverse effects of interrupting precordial compression during cardiopulmonary resuscitationCritical Care Medicine, 1997