Benefits of Smaller Electrode Surface Area (4 mm2) on Steroid-Eluting Leads
- 1 December 1991
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 14 (12) , 2098-2104
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1991.tb06480.x
Abstract
The purpose was to test whether a reduction of pacemaker electrode surface area below 8 mm2 improves leads that elute steroid from the electrode tip to the surrounding myocardium. A standard-sized 8 mm2 lead with 1 mg dexamethasone was implanted in 12 patients and a lead with 4 mm2 electrode surface area and 0.5 mg dexamethasone in ten patients. Pacing threshold, impedance, and sensing threshold were measured at implantation and after 1, 4, and 12 weeks. Pacing thresholds were similar for both groups and were always less than or equal to 0.8 V at 0.5 msec pulse duration in all patients. Impedance was significantly higher (P less than 0.05) for the 4 mm2 lead (implantation: 726 +/- 119 ohms; 1 week: 596 +/- 71 ohms; 4 weeks: 624 +/- 68 ohms; 12 weeks: 643 +/- 56 ohms) than for the 8 mm2 lead (implantation: 422 +/- 43 ohms; 1 week: 402 +/- 48 ohms; 4 weeks: 439 +/- 57 ohms; 12 weeks: 449 +/- 61 ohms). R wave amplitudes did not differ between both groups; no sensing failure occurred at 5 mV sensitivity. Compared to the 8 mm2 lead the reduction of surface area to 4 mm2 did not influence pacing threshold, but resulted in a higher pacing impedance. The amount of pacing energy was lower in the smaller-sized electrode. For clinical impact, low pacing threshold and high impedance leads are the condition to implant pulse generators with smaller battery capacity.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- A New Efficient NanoTip LeadPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1990
- In Vivo Elution Rate of Drug Eluting Ceramic Leads with a Reduced Dose of Dexamethasone Sodium PhosphatePacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1990
- DDDR PacingPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1990
- Do Electrode and Lead Design Differences for Permanent Cardiac Pacing Translate into Clinically Demonstrable Differences? (Comparison of Sintered Platinum and Activated Vitreous and Porous Carbon Electrodes)Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1989
- Rate Responsive Cardiac Pacing‐A PerspectivePacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1989
- Paired Comparisons of Steroid-Eluting and Nonsteroid Endocardial Pacemaker Leads in Dogs: Electrical Performance and Morphologic AlterationsPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1988
- Target Lead—Low Threshold ElectrodePacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1986
- Acute and Long‐Term Atrial and Ventricular Stimulation Thresholds with a Steroid‐Eluting ElectrodePacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1985
- The Porous Endocardial ElectrodePacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1979
- Problems in measuring threshold for cardiac pacing: Recommendations for routine clinical measurementThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1977