Velocity Mapping Capabilities of Present and Future Altimeter Missions: The Role of High-Frequency Signals
Open Access
- 1 December 2002
- journal article
- Published by American Meteorological Society in Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
- Vol. 19 (12) , 2077-2087
- https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2002)019<2077:vmcopa>2.0.co;2
Abstract
A detailed analysis of the velocity field mapping capabilities from existing and future multiple altimeter missions is carried out using the Los Alamos North Atlantic high-resolution model. The velocity mapping errors on the instantaneous fields and on 10-day averaged fields are systematically computed for all analyzed configurations. The T/P+ERS (Jason-1+ENVISAT) mapping error on the velocity remains acceptable (20%–30%) relative to the ocean signal. Mapping errors of 10-day averaged fields are twice as small, which shows that this configuration has a good potential for mapping lower frequencies of the velocity field. Compared to T/P+ERS, T/P+Jason-1 has a smaller error by about 20%–30% mainly because it is less sensitive to the aliasing of high-frequency signals. The mapping errors are twice as small with a three interleaved Jason-1 configuration. One of the main findings of this study is the role of high-frequency signals that strongly limit the velocity mapping accuracy. The high-wavenumber h... Abstract A detailed analysis of the velocity field mapping capabilities from existing and future multiple altimeter missions is carried out using the Los Alamos North Atlantic high-resolution model. The velocity mapping errors on the instantaneous fields and on 10-day averaged fields are systematically computed for all analyzed configurations. The T/P+ERS (Jason-1+ENVISAT) mapping error on the velocity remains acceptable (20%–30%) relative to the ocean signal. Mapping errors of 10-day averaged fields are twice as small, which shows that this configuration has a good potential for mapping lower frequencies of the velocity field. Compared to T/P+ERS, T/P+Jason-1 has a smaller error by about 20%–30% mainly because it is less sensitive to the aliasing of high-frequency signals. The mapping errors are twice as small with a three interleaved Jason-1 configuration. One of the main findings of this study is the role of high-frequency signals that strongly limit the velocity mapping accuracy. The high-wavenumber h...Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Modeling the high‐frequency barotropic response of the ocean to atmospheric disturbances: Sensitivity to forcing, topography, and frictionJournal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2001
- Use of a High-Resolution Model to Analyze the Mapping Capabilities of Multiple-Altimeter MissionsJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2001
- Global high‐resolution mapping of ocean circulation from TOPEX/Poseidon and ERS‐1 and ‐2Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2000
- Global statistical space‐time scales of oceanic variability estimated from the TOPEX/POSEIDON altimeter dataJournal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2000
- Mesoscale Mapping Capabilities of Multiple-Satellite Altimeter MissionsJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 1999
- ERS‐1/2 orbit improvement using TOPEX/POSEIDON: The 2 cm challengeJournal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1998
- An Improved Mapping Method of Multisatellite Altimeter DataJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 1998
- High‐frequency variability of western boundary currents using ERS 1 three‐day repeat altimeter dataJournal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1995
- Estimation of time averages from irregularly spaced observations: With application to coastal zone color scanner estimates of chlorophyll concentrationJournal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1991
- A technique for objective analysis and design of oceanographic experiments applied to MODE-73Deep Sea Research and Oceanographic Abstracts, 1976