Defocusing for the Schulz Technique of Determining Preferred Orientation
- 1 September 1970
- journal article
- research article
- Published by AIP Publishing in Journal of Applied Physics
- Vol. 41 (10) , 3944-3948
- https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1658393
Abstract
During measurement of preferred crystallographic orientation with the Schulz x‐ray diffraction technique, several factors can cause defocusing. Earlier investigations showed that tilt of the specimen in Φ, the angle between the normal to the sample surface and the normal to the diffracting plane, is the most severe limitation for the Schulz reflection technique. The present study shows that this defocusing effect is strongly dependent on the size of the Bragg diffraction angle θ: The greater the Bragg angle, the smaller the decrease in intensity for a given tilt angle of Φ. On the other hand, the absorption coefficient μ of the sample has no influence on the decrease in intensity with increasing tilt in Φ, and its effect is negligibly small for most metals. Correction factors for the loss of intensity can be derived and have a general analytic form, but different coefficients are required for each goniometer setting.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Annealing textures in zircaloy tubingJournal of Nuclear Materials, 1970
- Determination of Relative Intensity in X-Ray Reflection StudyJournal of Applied Physics, 1965
- Zählrohr‐Verfahren mit einem neuentwickelten Probenhalter zur Darstellung von Texturen in quantitativen PolfigurenArchiv für das Eisenhüttenwesen, 1958
- Method for Obtaining Complete Quantitative Pole Figures for Flat Sheets Using One Sample and One Sample HolderJournal of Applied Physics, 1955
- Quantitative Pole Figures for Sheet Material by the Reflection TechniqueReview of Scientific Instruments, 1954
- Analysis of Certain Errors in the X-Ray Reflection Method for the Quantitative Determination of Preferred OrientationsJournal of Applied Physics, 1952
- Geiger-Counter X-Ray Spectrometer - Influence of Size and Absorption Coefficient of Specimen on Position and Shape of Powder Diffraction MaximaJournal of Scientific Instruments, 1950
- A Direct Method of Determining Preferred Orientation of a Flat Reflection Sample Using a Geiger Counter X-Ray SpectrometerJournal of Applied Physics, 1949