Superior Cardiac Hemodynamics of Atrioventricular Synchrony Over Rate Responsive Pacing at Submaximal Exercise: Observations in Activity Sensing DDDR Pacemakers
- 1 December 1990
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 13 (12) , 1832-1837
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1990.tb06899.x
Abstract
LAU, C.‐P., ET AL.: Superior Cardiac Hemodynamics of Atrioventricular Synchrony Over Rate Responsive Pacing at Submaximal Exercise: Observations in Activity Sensing DDDR Pacemakers. The relative hemodynamic profile between dual chamber pacing (DDD) and activity sensing rate responsive pacing (VVIR) was compared in ten patients with dual chamber rate responsive pacemakers (Synergist 11). With a double blind, randomized exercise protocol, DDDR pacemakers were programmed into VVI, VVIR, and DDD (AV interval 150 msec) modes and in seven patients the test in the DDD mode was repeated with the AV interval programmed at 75 msec. A treadmill exercise test of 6‐minutes duration (2 stages, Stage 1 at 2 mph, 0% gradient and Stage II at 2 mph, 15% gradient) was performed at each of the programmed settings, with a rest period of 30 minutes in between tests. Cardiac output was assessed using continuous‐wave Doppler sampling ascending aortic flow and expressed as a percentage of the value achieved during VVI pacing. During exercise, pacing rate between DDD and VVIR pacing was similar but was higher with DDD at the first minute of recovery (91 ± 4vs 81 ± 3 beat/min, respectively). Cardiac output was significantly higher at rest, during low level exercise, and recovery with DDD pacing compared with VVIR pacing (resting: 21 ± 14 vs ‐2 ± 7%; Stage I: 36 ± 6 vs 16 ± 7%; Stage II: 25 ± 15 vs 10 ± 8%; recovery: 26 ± 12 vs 4 ± 9%; p < 0.05 in all cases). Systolic blood pressure was significantly higher during low level of exercise in the DDD mode. Shortening of the AV interval to 75 msec did not significantly affect cardiac output during exercise, but cardiac output after exercise was reduced (2 ± 6 vs 23 ± 6% at an AV interval of 150 msec, p < 0.02). By enhancing the stroke volume, DDD pacing improves cardiac hemodynamics at rest, during low level exercise, and early postexercise recovery.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Optimal atrioventricular delay at rest and during exercise in patients with dual chamber pacemakers: a non-invasive assessment by continuous wave Doppler.Heart, 1989
- Role of left ventricular function and Doppler-derived variables in predicting hemodynamic benefits of rate-responsive pacingThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1988
- The Importance of Different Atrioventricular Intervals for Exercise CapacityPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1988
- Importance of left atrial timing in the programming of dual-chamber pacemakersThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1987
- Physiological Relationship Between AV Interval and Heart Rate in Healthy Subjects: Applications to Dual Chamber PacingPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1986
- Hemodynamic comparison of ventricular pacing, atrioventricular sequential pacing, and atrial synchronous ventricular pacing using radionuclide ventriculographyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1986
- Maintenance of exercise stroke volume during ventricular versus atrial synchronous pacing: role of contractility.Circulation, 1985
- Comparison of Resting Hemodynamic Indices and Exercise Performance During Atrial Synchronized and Asynchronous Ventricular PacingPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1983
- Hemodynamic benefits of atrioventricular sequential pacing after cardiac surgeryThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1977
- HAEMODYNAMIC EFFECT OF ATRIAL TRIGGERED VERSUS FIXED RATE PACING AT REST AND DURING EXERCISE IN COMPLETE HEART BLOCKActa Medica Scandinavica, 1975