A comparison between different numerical methods used to solve Poisson’s and Schroedinger’s equations in semiconductor heterostructures
- 1 September 1993
- journal article
- Published by AIP Publishing in Journal of Applied Physics
- Vol. 74 (5) , 3273-3276
- https://doi.org/10.1063/1.354548
Abstract
A comparison between different numerical methods which are used to solve Poisson’s and Schroedinger’s equations in semiconductor heterostructures is presented. Considering Schroedinger’s equation, both the Rayleigh–Ritz method and the finite difference method are examined. The accuracy and the computational speed are investigated as a function of both the mesh size and the number of Rayleigh–Ritz functions and the numerical results are compared with analytical solutions for special cases. To solve Poisson’s equation, direct and iterative methods are implemented and the advantages and limitations of each method are discussed. The previous methods are used to solve Poisson’s and Schroedinger’s equations self-consistently in typical heterostructures to obtain the wave functions, the carrier distribution, and the subband energies.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- A one-dimensional, self-consistent numerical solution of Schrödinger and Poisson equationsJournal of Applied Physics, 1991
- A self-consistent solution of Schrödinger–Poisson equations using a nonuniform meshJournal of Applied Physics, 1990
- Analysis of the shallow and deep center occupancies in Si-doped AlxGa1−xAs using a multilevel donor modelJournal of Applied Physics, 1989
- Drift velocity comparison between high-electron mobility transistors and doped-channel field-effect transistors at very small dimensionsJournal of Applied Physics, 1988
- Scaled GaAs MESFET's with gate length down to 100 nmIEEE Electron Device Letters, 1986
- Monte Carlo study of electronic transport in As/GaAs single-well heterostructuresPhysical Review B, 1986
- Very short gate-length GaAs MESFET'sIEEE Electron Device Letters, 1985