Selection of Judges for Standard‐Setting
- 1 June 1991
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice
- Vol. 10 (2) , 3-14
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1991.tb00185.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differential Use of Item Information by Judges Using Angoff and Nedeisky ProceduresJournal of Educational Measurement, 1988
- Use and Effect of Caution Indices in Detecting Aberrant Patterns of Standard-Setting JudgmentsApplied Measurement in Education, 1988
- A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION OF THREE COMPROMISE METHODS FOR ESTABLISHING CUT‐OFF SCORESETS Research Report Series, 1987
- In Pursuit of the Expert PedagogueEducational Researcher, 1986
- Culture as Consensus: A Theory of Culture and Informant AccuracyAmerican Anthropologist, 1986
- Consistency and Consensus among Informants: Disease Concepts in a Rural Mexican VillageAmerican Anthropologist, 1984
- A COMPARISON OF THREE METHODS FOR ESTABLISHING MINIMUM STANDARDS ON THE NATIONAL TEACHER EXAMINATIONSJournal of Educational Measurement, 1984
- A LATENT TRAIT METHOD FOR DETERMINING INTRAJUDGE INCONSISTENCY IN THE ANGOFF AND NEDELSKY TECHNIQUES OF STANDARD SETTINGJournal of Educational Measurement, 1982
- An Iterative Structured Judgment Process for Establishing Standards on Competency Tests: Theory and ApplicationEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1982
- A Comparison of the Nedelsky and Angoff Cutting Score Procedures Using Generalizability TheoryApplied Psychological Measurement, 1980