The level of compressive load affects conclusions from statistical analyses to determine whether a lateral meniscal autograft restores tibial contact pressure to normal: A study in human cadaveric knees
- 1 May 2003
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Orthopaedic Research
- Vol. 21 (3) , 459-464
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0736-0266(02)00201-2
Abstract
This study addressed the question of whether the level of compressive load would affect the conclusions from statistical analyses aimed at determining how well a lateral meniscal autograft restores tibial contact (as indicated by the maximum contact pressure, mean pressure, and contact area) to that of the intact knee. If statistical analyses indicated that normal tibial contact was not restored with a higher, more physiologic load, then a secondary question was whether an autograft surgically implanted with bone plugs would improve tibial contact compared to that in a meniscectomized knee. Nine, fresh‐frozen human cadaveric knees were subjected to a low, non‐physiologic compressive load of 400 N and a higher, more physiologic compressive load of 1200 N under three conditions (lateral meniscus intact, lateral meniscus removed and reimplanted as an autograft, and lateral meniscus removed). Contact pressure on the lateral plateau was measured with pressure sensitive film at 0°, 15°, 30°, and 45° of flexion. At 400 N, p‐values from statistical analyses indicated that both the maximum and mean pressures with the autograft were comparable to those of the intact knee (p ≥ 0.685). However, at 1200 N, p‐values from statistical analyses indicated that both the maximum and mean pressures with the autograft were significantly greater than those of the intact knee (p ≤ 0.0001). Therefore studies designed to evaluate tibial contact pressure for a meniscal transplant should use a higher, more physiologic compressive load, because lower loads overestimate the transplant's effectiveness. Although none of the contact variables was restored to normal when the compressive load was increased to 1200 N, all of the contact variables were more normal than those of the meniscectomized knee. Thus, lateral meniscal allografts implanted using bone plugs can significantly improve contact pressure relative to a meniscectomized knee at the time of implantation.© 2002 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nonanatomic Location of the Posterior Horn of a Medial Meniscal Autograft Implanted in a Cadaveric Knee Adversely Affects the Pressure Distribution on the Tibial PlateauThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2002
- How Three Methods for Fixing a Medial Meniscal Autograft Affect Tibial Contact MechanicsThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1999
- The Effect of Allograft Meniscal Replacement on Intraarticular Contact Area and Pressures in the Human KneeThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1997
- Mathematical model of the lower extremity joint reaction forces using Kane’s method of dynamicsJournal of Biomechanics, 1997
- Is it important to secure the horns during lateral meniscal transplantation? A cadaveric studyArthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 1996
- A New Load Application System for In Vitro Study of Ligamentous Injuries to the Human Knee JointJournal of Biomechanical Engineering, 1995
- The spatial and pressure resolution of fuji pressure-sensitive filmExperimental Mechanics, 1995
- Implementation of a Five Degree of Freedom Automated System to Determine Knee Flexibility In VitroJournal of Biomechanical Engineering, 1990
- A Numerical Model of the Load Transmission in the Tibio-Femoral Contact AreaProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 1990
- The Biomechanics of Lower Extremity Action in Distance RunningFoot & Ankle, 1987