Appropriateness ratings: overuse, underuse, or misuse?
- 1 November 2001
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in The Lancet
- Vol. 358 (9292) , 1475-1476
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(01)06569-2
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using observational data to estimate prognosis: an example using a coronary artery disease registryStatistics in Medicine, 2001
- Hypothetical ratings of coronary angiography appropriateness: are they associated with actual angiographic findings, mortality, and revascularisation rate? The ACRE studyHeart, 2001
- Underuse of Coronary Revascularization Procedures in Patients Considered Appropriate Candidates for RevascularizationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Rating the appropriateness of coronary angiography, coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting: the ACRE studyJournal of Public Health, 1999
- Underuse of Cardiac Procedures: Do Women, Ethnic Minorities, and the Uninsured Fail To Receive Needed Revascularization?Annals of Internal Medicine, 1999
- The Urgent Need to Improve Health Care QualityInstitute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care QualityJAMA, 1998
- Measuring and Averting Underuse of Necessary Cardiac Procedures: A Summary of Results and Future DirectionsThe Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, 1997
- Users' Guides to the Medical LiteraturePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1995
- Does Inappropriate Use Explain Geographic Variations in the Use of Health Care Services?JAMA, 1987
- Physician ratings of appropriate indications for six medical and surgical procedures.American Journal of Public Health, 1986