Usability Evaluation of Computer-Assisted Survey Instruments
- 1 November 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Social Science Computer Review
- Vol. 18 (4) , 384-396
- https://doi.org/10.1177/089443930001800402
Abstract
Computer-assisted interviewing (CAI) has a substantial impact on the way interviewers carry out the task of interviewing. Survey instruments are becoming more complex, necessitating new skills of interviewers. In addition to question wording, the design of CAI instruments is a focus of evaluation and pretesting efforts. This article reports on a variety of research activities related to the usability testing of CAI instruments, focusing both on interviewers (in interviewer-administered surveys) and respondents (in self-administered surveys). The article introduces practices and procedures of usability testing, illustrated with examples from several recent studies in which these methods were applied to the evaluation of computerized survey instruments.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effect of New Data Collection Technologies on Survey Data QualityPublished by Wiley ,1997
- Towards a Theory of Self‐Administered Questionnaire DesignPublished by Wiley ,1997
- Evaluating Interviewer Use of CAPI TechnologyPublished by Wiley ,1997
- A heuristic evaluation of a World Wide Web prototypeInteractions, 1996
- How do desk-top computers affect the doctor-patient interactionFamily Practice, 1995
- Interpersonal communication and human-computer interaction: an examination of the use of computers in medical consultationsInteracting with Computers, 1993
- New Technology in Survey Research: Computer-Assisted Personal Interviewing (CAPI)Social Science Computer Review, 1992
- An agenda for human-computer interaction: science and engineering serving human needsACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 1991
- Social Survey MethodsPublished by Practical Action Publishing ,1991
- Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing: Effects on Interviewers and RespondentsPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1984