What Undergraduate Physical Education Majors Learn during a Field Experience
- 1 December 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
- Vol. 63 (4) , 381-392
- https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1992.10608760
Abstract
Early field experiences and student teaching have a significant impact on the development of prospective teachers' perceptions of teaching and themselves as teachers (Dodds, 1989). The purpose of this study was to describe what happened to physical education majors during a secondary physical education methodology course that included two field experiences in which the undergraduates taught at least one lesson a day. The four research questions that guided the study were (a) What issues did the majors attend to as significant incidents from their teaching, and did these issues change during their field experiences? (b) What were the characteristics of field experience lessons they perceived as successful? (c) What were the characteristics of field experience lessons they perceived as unsuccessful? and (d) What were the physical education majors' conceptions of teaching? Participants in the study were 39 junior-year physical education teacher education majors. Data were collected using the critical incident technique (Flanagan, 1954) and an open-ended, written questionnaire that was designed to encourage the majors to reflect on various aspects of their teaching experience. The questionnaire and critical incidents were analyzed using an inductive analytical procedure and a series of categories developed from several readings of students' writings. The teacher preparation program affected how these trainees defined and evaluated their teaching experiences. In contrast to some of the earlier work in physical education, the results indicated pupil learning, quality lesson planning to ensure pupil learning, and efficient lesson management were major characteristics of successful lessons for these trainees. The trainees presented “theories of knowledge” that emphasized technical concepts of teaching with little attention to the social or ethical dimensions of their work or the content knowledge of their field. Additional research is needed to examine appropriate programmatic efforts to help preservice teachers reflect not only on teaching, learning, and schooling as a technical enterprise but also as a moral and ethical enterprise.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Imagination, emotions and scientific thinking: what matters in the being and becoming of a teacher of elementary science?Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2011
- The Influence of Teacher Education on Preservice Development: Beyond a Custodial OrientationQuest, 1991
- Teacher Education Students' Preconceptions of TeachingJournal of Teacher Education, 1989
- Field Experience as a Vehicle for Transformation: Ideology, Education, and Reflective PracticeJournal of Teacher Education, 1989
- Reflective teaching and teacher educationTeaching and Teacher Education, 1989
- The Practicum as an Occasion for Learning to TeachSouth Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 1986
- Teacher Cognition: Differences in Planning and Interactive Decision Making between Experienced and Inexperienced TeachersResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 1985
- Teaching Behavior through Various Levels of Field ExperiencesJournal of Teaching in Physical Education, 1983
- Student Expectations and Teacher Education Traditions with Which We Can and Cannot LiveJournal of Teacher Education, 1983
- The critical incident technique.Psychological Bulletin, 1954