The Reorganisation of Large Firm Subcontracting: Myth and Reality
- 1 March 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Capital & Class
- Vol. 17 (1) , 53-75
- https://doi.org/10.1177/030981689304900104
Abstract
This article brings into sharper focus an aspect of the restructuring debate: namely the post Fordist orthodoxy which seeks to emphasise the centrality of the locality and the role of small and medium sized firms. Drawing on evidence from empirical examples, including the Hertfordshire study, Rainnie demonstrates that whilst the functions of large firms may be decentralised, with units taking on local appearances, control still resides in the hands of a distant and global management, often overiding local concerns.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Industrial Reorganization in Europe: Patterns of Convergence and Divergence in Germany, France and BritainWork, Employment & Society, 1991
- Just-in-Time, Sub-Contracting and the Small FirmWork, Employment & Society, 1991
- The UK Whiteware Industry: Fordism, Flexibility or Somewhere in Between?Regional Studies, 1991
- Nike just did it: International Subcontracting and Flexibility in Athletic Footwear ProductionRegional Studies, 1990
- A missing link:the relationship between distribution and industrial compled formation*Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 1990
- Local economic strategies as industrial policy: a critical review of British developments in the 1980sEconomy and Society, 1989
- Little victories local economic development in European regionsEntrepreneurship & Regional Development, 1989
- SPATIAL RESPONSES TO FORDIST AND POST‐FORDIST ACCUMULATION AND REGULATIONPapers in Regional Science, 1988