Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Status of the Trials
- 1 October 2006
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Interventional Cardiology
- Vol. 19 (s5) , S3-S7
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8183.2006.00164.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Five-Year Outcomes After Coronary Stenting Versus Bypass Surgery for the Treatment of Multivessel DiseaseJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005
- Long-Term Outcomes of Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting versus Stent ImplantationNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing coronary artery bypass graft with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: one- to eight-year outcomesJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2003
- Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Multivessel Coronary Artery DiseaseCirculation, 2002
- Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (the Stent or Surgery trial): a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2002
- Comparison of Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery and Stenting for the Treatment of Multivessel DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Seven-year outcome in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) by treatment and diabetic statusJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2000
- Influence of Diabetes on 5-Year Mortality and Morbidity in a Randomized Trial Comparing CABG and PTCA in Patients With Multivessel DiseaseCirculation, 1997
- Comparison of Coronary Bypass Surgery with Angioplasty in Patients with Multivessel DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- A Randomized Trial Comparing Coronary Angioplasty with Coronary Bypass SurgeryNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994