Power Transitions and Great Power War from Westphalia to Waterloo
- 1 October 1992
- journal article
- Published by Project MUSE in World Politics
- Vol. 45 (1) , 153-172
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2010522
Abstract
This study extends recent research on the power transition and hegemonic stability theory to the preindustrial era. It improves on the original power transition theory by relaxing an assumption and by extending the empirical domain. Unlike the original power transition theory, the revised version is not restricted to the period after the industrial revolution and can therefore be applied to the preindustrial era. This study examines the empirical record prior to the industrial revolution to see whether the power transition and hegemonic stability theory holds for that period. The data for 1648 to 1815 indicate strong support for the power transition contention that a rough equality of power between rival sides increases the likelihood of war. That is, when the challenging great power, with its allies' support, catches up with the dominant power, great power war is most likely.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Twist of TruthJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1989
- Power Transitions as a Cause of WarJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1988
- Seapower in Global Politics, 1494–1993Published by Springer Nature ,1988
- The Decision to Ally: A Theory and TestThe Western Political Quarterly, 1984
- Power, Alliance, and the Escalation of International Conflict, 1815-1965American Political Science Review, 1984
- European Political Facts 1648–1789Published by Springer Nature ,1984
- Alliance Formation and War BehaviorJournal of Conflict Resolution, 1981
- European Political Facts 1789–1848Published by Springer Nature ,1981
- The War LedgerPublished by University of Chicago Press ,1980
- The Long Cycle of Global Politics and the Nation-StateComparative Studies in Society and History, 1978