Costs Incurred by Patients Undergoing Advanced Colorectal Cancer Therapy
- 1 April 2000
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in PharmacoEconomics
- Vol. 17 (4) , 361-370
- https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200017040-00006
Abstract
To assess the cost effectiveness of healthcare interventions from a societal perspective, it is necessary to include costs such as patients' travel costs and the opportunity cost of patients' time spent consuming healthcare. To analyse patients' travel and time costs associated with 2 alternative drug therapies for advanced colorectal cancer: raltitrexed and fluorouracil plus folinic acid (leucovorin) [5FU + FA]. The analysis is based on a prospective substudy within a multinational randomised controlled trial of raltitrexed versus 5FU + FA. 495 patients with advanced colorectal cancer were enrolled in the trial, 270 of whom completed the questionnaire on costs. Data were collected within the trial to estimate the numbers of journeys made to and from hospital by patients and the time lost from usual activities over the period of therapy. A subset of patients were asked to complete a questionnaire to provide the information necessary to value time and travel costs in monetary terms. These data, together with UK transport costs and forgone time values, were used to value the transport and opportunity costs of time of all patients in the trial. The total travel cost per patient was statistically significantly higher in the 5FU + FA group (p < 0.001; median of 31.50 Pounds with raltitrexed, 96.00 Pounds with 5FU + FA; 1997 prices). Overall time cost per patient was also higher in the 5FU + FA group (p = 0.005; median of 168.80 Pounds with raltitrexed, 224.04 Pounds with 5FU + FA). Adding the two gives a median total cost per patient of 206.08 Pounds [interquartile range (IQR) 108 Pounds to 482 Pounds] among patients randomised to raltitrexed and 342.25 Pounds (IQR 214 Pounds to 555 Pounds) for those in the 5FU + FA group (p < 0.001). The sensitivity analysis showed that, even under extreme assumptions, raltitrexed imposed fewer time and travel costs on patients. These cost differences are likely, in part, to reflect the longer treatment times for 5FU + FA patients (median 16.9 vs 12.7 weeks). Different chemotherapy regimens for advanced colorectal cancer can impose different travel and time costs on patients. Over the period of treatment in a randomised controlled trial of 495 patients, those randomised to 5FU + FA were found to have a median travel plus time cost 136 Pounds per patient higher than those randomised to raltitrexed.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- A patient preference study comparing raltitrexed (‘Tomudex’) and bolus or infusional 5-fluorouracil regimens in advanced colorectal cancer: influence of side-effects and administration attributesEuropean Journal of Cancer Care, 1999
- An economic comparison of the net clinical benefit and treatment costs of raltitrexed and 5-fluorouracil + leucovorin (Mayo regimen) in advanced colorectal cancerJournal of Medical Economics, 1999
- Open, randomized, multicenter trial of raltitrexed versus fluorouracil plus high-dose leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Tomudex Colorectal Cancer Study Group.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1998
- Mature results from three large controlled studies with raltitrexed ('Tomudex')British Journal of Cancer, 1998
- Reduced pharmacy resource utilization associated with raltitrexed treatment of advanced colorectal cancerJournal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, 1997
- An analysis of drug costs for the management of chemotherapy-related side effects in advanced colorectal cancerJournal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, 1996
- Private versus social opportunity cost of time: Valuing time in the demand for health careHealth Economics, 1994
- Economic Analysis Alongside Clinical Trials: Revisiting the Methodological IssuesInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1991