On Validity
- 1 August 1981
- journal article
- other
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation Review
- Vol. 5 (4) , 567-576
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x8100500407
Abstract
Employing criterion validation procedures in cases where constructs are being assessed has resulted in contamination of many validation efforts by mono-operation bias. One result of this mistake is that self-reports, which are typically validated against behavioral measures, appear to have poor validity, leading to disenchantment with self-report techniques. Results of several investigations, wherein criterion measures are multiply operationalized, have demonstrated that self-report measures are more valid than the behavioral indices which were employed as criterion measures in previous studies to validate those self-reports. The relative strengths and weaknesses of introspective versus extraspective assessment approaches are then discussed.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dependent Variable Reliability and Determination of Sample SizeApplied Psychological Measurement, 1980
- Response-Shift BiasEvaluation Review, 1980
- The stability of behavior: I. On predicting most of the people much of the time.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979
- Behaviorism and the mind: A (limited) call for a return to introspection.American Psychologist, 1979
- Sex Differences in Assertiveness in College StudentsThe Journal of Psychology, 1977
- On predicting some of the people some of the time: The search for cross-situational consistencies in behavior.Psychological Review, 1974
- Validity of a measure of assertiveness.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1974
- The college self-expression scale: A measure of assertivenessBehavior Therapy, 1974
- Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 1959