A Counter‐policy to Subvert Education Reform? Collaboration among Schools and Colleges in a Competitive Climate
- 1 April 1998
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in British Educational Research Journal
- Vol. 24 (2) , 195-215
- https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192980240206
Abstract
The concept of a ‘counter‐policy’ is articulated as a heuristic device for grasping the process of mediation whereby implementation of national policies may stimulate resistance and co‐optation at other education system levels. The discussion is illustrated through exploratory research into initiatives promoting collaboration among English schools and colleges, some enjoying local education authority (LEA) support. The term counter‐policy is defined and located within a local perspective on national policy implementation; the scope of the investigation is summarised; the national policy context stimulating counter‐policies is sketched; how far the collaborative groups studied had developed a counter‐policy is discussed; interaction between key players at different system levels impacting on these counter‐policies is outlined, including reference to related counter‐policies developed in some LEAs; and conclusions are drawn about application of the counter‐policy concept to collaborative initiatives, utility of the conceptual orientation, an agenda for further research, and the potential of collaborative initiatives to subvert central government reform.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- School Development Planning in Jersey Primary Schools: a contingency analysisSchool Organisation, 1996
- Policy Interaction and Policy ImplementationEducational Management & Administration, 1996
- Inter-School Links, Liaison and Networking: Collaboration or Competition ?Educational Management & Administration, 1995
- Some reflections on policy theory: a brief response to Hatcher and TroynaJournal of Education Policy, 1994
- The ‘Policy Cycle’: A Ball by Ball AccountJournal of Education Policy, 1994
- Collaboration as a Subversive Activity: a professional response to externally imposed competition between schools?School Leadership & Management, 1993
- Coping with multiple innovations in schools: An exploratory studySchool Organisation, 1991
- Contradictory interests in policy implementation: the case of LEA development plans for schoolsJournal of Education Policy, 1991
- Innovation for All: Management Development in Small Primary SchoolsEducational Management & Administration, 1988
- Street-Level Bureaucrats and Institutional Innovation: Implementing Special-Education ReformHarvard Educational Review, 1977