How useful are unpublished data from the Food and Drug Administration in meta-analysis?
- 31 January 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 56 (1) , 44-51
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00520-6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?Published by Elsevier ,1998
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1996
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJAMA, 1995
- A study of manufacturer-supported trials of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of arthritisArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1994
- Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trialsPublished by Elsevier ,1993
- Diclofenac delays healing of gastroduodenal mucosal lesionsDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1991
- Some Statistical Methods for Combining Experimental ResultsInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1990
- Negative StudiesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1989
- A Controlled Endoscopic Study Comparing the Toxic Effects of Sulindac, Naproxen, Aspirin, and Placebo on the Gastric Mucosa of Healthy VolunteersThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1984
- Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of testsPsychometrika, 1951